Showing posts with label Centre for Contemporary Art (Internship). Show all posts
Showing posts with label Centre for Contemporary Art (Internship). Show all posts

Friday, 3 October 2014

journal RECAP | Internship

Gillman Barracks [By: Samantha Yap]
"When I speak of representation, I am thinking of presence and action, I am thinking, is our art world diverse and inclusive enough? Is it amplifying voices and strengthening the presence of those who have already been consistently in the fore? I realize I am trying (or aspiring) to deconstruct a paradigm in order to see what are the walls of barrier and powers at play."
Samantha Yap, 5 September 2014, I'll be your mirror


prep room, NUS Museum [By: Luca Lum]




"8. Anxieties of come-what-mays, erudition and wall text mastery;
9. A thousand blank walls of potentiality - the space to research, interrogate, dream;
10. Above all else, poetry."
Raksha Mahtani, 8 September 2014, Museum [noun]
 

 


"In the arts, although the affordability of time offers stability with long-term benefits, I think working within limitations can also spur us on towards more creative synergy as we consciously expound on what we have."
Bernice Ong, 10 September 2014, Pulau Gillman





Safe Sea, National Museum of Singapore [By: Chua Ying Qing]
 "When the audience experiences an exhibition, they perceive it through a series of reflections. They never get to see the original source – the womb of curatorial intention. The trick then is not to leave traces of the illusion/intrusion. For we are now double agents, and this is the perfect crime." 
Chua Ying Qing, 15 September 2014, in four movements

Post-Popup, Centre for Contemporary Art
[By: Melvin Tan]



"The operational currency leans towards outreach and inclusivity...This offers an effervescence of programmes that makes the institutional platform unprecedentedly accessible, experimental and tangential to more professional practices in the vicinity."
Melvin Tan, 17 September 2014, 
Thoughts around the Institutional Prerogative: Part 2 PostPop-Up 





Shabbir Hussain Mustafa & Charles Lim
[By: Selene Yap]
"How do we map an experience? Across the grids that mark our seas, how do memories, ideas, and existence become decontextualised?  The absurdity of mapping or dividing the fluid composition of the sea into pixels of definable space parallels the tensions of confines imposed on the shifting location of human consciousness."
Cheng Jia Yun, Euginia Tan, Selene Yap, Wong Yeang Cherng, 
22 September 2014, 0018A / 5724C
[By: Kenneth Loe]



"“Curatorrent”, an obvious portmanteau of “curator” and “torrent”, was born in my attempts at hacking together a word within a set of self-imposed conditions...if we look at definition no. 2 of “torrent”, as “an overwhelming flow of thoughts, words, sound, etc”, you would be looking at a one-word tour d’horizon of my experience in the deep undulations of theory and theatricality"
Kenneth Loe, 24 September 2014, Pirates of the Curatorrent


thislandisourlab.tumblr.com

"The curator, like the translator, tries to mobilise a thing — an idea, or an artwork — from one co-ordinate to another, from an artist's personal oeuvre to the context of the exhibition and new sets of relations with other works. In doing so, the act of translation enacts transformations. "
Luca Lum, 26 September 2014,  
The Task(s) of the Curator*


Wednesday, 24 September 2014

journal | Pirates of the Curatorrent

by Kenneth Loe
Centre for Contemporary Art, Singapore 

 Image: Kenneth Loe
“torrent (ˈtɒrənt)
n
1. (Physical Geography) a fast, voluminous, or violent stream of water or other liquid
2. an overwhelming flow of thoughts, words, sound, etc
3. (Computer Science) computing a file that controls the transfer of data in a BitTorrent system. See BitTorrent [1]

I admit. My childhood fixation with 17th century buccaneers and their wayward seafaring ways never really went away. From plundering the “Horrible Histories” series in the children’s section at my neighborhood library for books on them Vicious Vikings and Plundering Pirates, which in hindsight was my first encounter with the authority of alliteration, to building and running my very own pirate haven as Pirate King on the PC game, Tropico 2: Pirate Cove, I was acquainted with infamous pirates, from the can(n)onical Blackbeard and Anne Bonny to the fictional Captain Hook and Long John Silver. Needless to say, I was hooked, line and sinker.

A whole decade later, as I mull over my month-long immersion at the Centre of Contemporary Art, I find myself hearkening back to those formative years and digging for doubloons. Incidentally, I had recently re-watched Pirates of the Caribbean trilogy, the glib repartee of the roguish Captain Jack Sparrow meets piratical phantasmagoria of sword-wielding lobster bisques and anthropomorphic barnacles. Something I gleaned from all three films was how the responsibilities of the crew were in perpetual flux in relation to its captain. Every crew member wore many hats (literally and figuratively), its multifarious directional approach in collusion with a compass that pointed to what one wanted most instead of mere magnetic North, a captaincy that was bound to the whim of the tides and the looming presence of the enemy, be it the nefarious Davy Jones and his pet kraken or the “it’s just good business” armada of the East India Company, the indeterminacy of a life at sea, a never-ending balancing act between one foot and a pegleg and a bottle of rum in between.

Before I expound on my experience further, perhaps I should explain in pseudo-etymological terms, within rhyme and reason, how I arrived at this farrago of a word, “curatorrent”. There is a bot on Twitter that goes by the handle @portmanteau_bot, a bot that for a period of time tweeted the most wondrous of algorhythmically-generated portmanteaus but in recent times have slumped into incomprehensible gibberish. “Curatorrent”, an obvious portmanteau of “curator” and “torrent”, was born in my attempts at hacking together a word within a set of self-imposed conditions:
  • The word has to contain some form of the word “curate”.
  • The word has to rhyme (kind of) with Caribbean.
  • The word has to make enough sense while sounding absurd.
The past few years have been inundated with news of the clamping down on countless Torrent sites in the name of copyright, forcing them to set sail, go under before re-surfacing over and over, the online cousin of POTC’s Flying Dutchman and its undead crew, namelessly and tirelessly toiling, seeding and ferrying torrents of data to and fro-yo ho! And if we look at definition no. 2 of “torrent”, as “an overwhelming flow of thoughts, words, sound, etc”, you would be looking at a one-word tour d’horizon of my experience in the deep undulations of theory and theatricality.

On my first day at CCA, I was introduced to a book that I was to spend the next month and a half ploughing through by Anca Rujoiu, CCA Curator Exhibitions. “Mimesis, Masochism & Mime: The Politics of Theatricality in Contemporary French Thought”, a book of essays edited by Timothy Murray, I was told, formed the basis of Theatrical Fields, the exhibition curated by Ute Meta Bauer, CCA Founding Director, and Anca, first presented at the Bildmuseet, Umeå in Sweden and currently exhibiting at CCA. I was tasked with assisting in the areas of research and public programmes for the exhibition.

The next month was spend swashbuckling with a diverse range of texts, some denser than others, from Derrida’s circuitous reading of Artaud’s Theatre of Cruelty to the super abstract but immensely enjoyable text by Luce Irigaray titled “The Stage Setup”. The essay reinterprets and subverts the phallocentricity immanent in Plato’s myth of the cave, the necessity of which lent itself to my watching of Mass Hysteria Relapsed!, a remarkable spoken word performance by the AmOk Collective that sought to “to re-act and negotiate the hysterical and the historical”[2], performed in late August as part of Indignation Festival, Singapore’s annual queer pride season. I was to spend a whole week on the text, albeit in disjointed spurts and long bouts of pondering double negations and complex conjunctions in a torrential jouissance of theorizing by Irigaray, before the gaze gave way to this light which is not one nor the sun.

Looking at this idea of the “curatorrent”, which if I were to elaborate would refer to “the deluge of information one devours in endeavoring to knowledge production through curatorial labour”, I can safely say I have never read so intensely or successively in a field of thought or re-oriented that radically the lens through which I approached and perceived something as I have when working on Theatrical Fields. Having always struggled with while relishing in being a “Jack of all trades”, dabbling into whatever I fancied or found an opportunity in, Curating Lab not withstanding, I was utmost daunted in the beginning by the task ahead of me and utterly grateful at the end to be inducted into a methodology I’ve always maintained I never had the tenacity for.

While my commitment in the month of July was primarily anchored to CCA, I still had obligations at the gallery I worked at to attend to. Concurrently, my fellow CCA mates and I had to conceptualise the workings of an exhibition that we are co-curating in January 2015. I saw myself constantly shuffling between roles, shuttling from working on research and public programmes at CCA to administrative work and managing an exhibition at the gallery, to learning the ropes of what curating an exhibition entails alongside my peers. The parallel I observed happening in the scenes of POTC resonated strongly with me, the switching between modes of existence a crew member assumes, from rigger to powder monkey to becoming cannon fodder, the swapping of captaincy from Jack Sparrow to Barbossa to the crew becoming captain. Of course, the perils of what I imagine to be a life at sea is but an analogy inflected by my 14-year-old self, a Peter Pirate Pan who decided not to grow up.

Screenshot of “The Curse of Monkey Island” A Pirate I was meant to be
Image: Ogeeku.com
The Curse of Monkey Island, yet another pirate-inspired adventure PC game I fell head over heels for while growing up, is a charming cartoon-ish cabal of object-based puzzle-solving and insult swordfighting in a marvelous display of wordplay. In one scene, the protagonist and playable character, Guybrush Threepwood, a buffoonish self-proclaimed “mighty pirate”, finds himself on a ship he stole and a crew he gathered from the local barbershop comprising of Cutthroat Bill, Haggis McMutton, and Edward Van Helgen. On boarding the ship, the hapless pirates break out into a song and dance that’s all rhyme and ridiculousness that feeds off Guybrush’s/your responses by turning it into a verse. The only way that Guybrush/you can stop them is to foil their scheme by coming up with a sentence that is metrically impossible for them to find a rhyme to. The scene ends with the following exchange:

“Guybrush: We'll surely avoid scurvy if we all eat an orange.
Haggis: And...!
Haggis: ...um...
Bill: Well...
Edward:...err...
Bill: Door hinge?
Edward:No, no...
Bill: Guess the song's over, then.
Haggis: Guess so.
Edward: Okay, back to work.
Guybrush: Well gee. I feel a little guilty, now.”

“In civilizations without boats, dreams dry up, espionage takes the place of adventure, and the police takes the place of pirates.”[3] As I rest my feet at this port of call before the next journey beckons, Foucault’s assertion that “the ship is the heterotopia par excellence” floats to mind. I console myself that oranges are not the only fruit and what I’d really like right now is a Bloody Mary sans guilt. Avast, me hearties!


[1] Collins English Dictionary – Complete and Unabridged © HarperCollins Publishers 2003
[2] From “Mass Hysteria Relapsed!” Facebook event page - https://www.facebook.com/events/1484726925104542/
[3] Michel Foucault. Of Other Spaces: Utopias and Heterotopias. In Architecture/ Mouvement/ Continuité journal, October 1984, translated from French by Jay Miskowiec

Wednesday, 17 September 2014

journal | Thoughts around the Institutional Prerogative: Part 2 PostPop-Up

by Melvin Tan
Centre for Contemporary Art, Singapore

As I write this post, the CCA attachment is still ongoing. I am mainly tasked to create the user manual for Block 38’s art space. The booklet is designed to elaborate on the use of Block 38's #01-07 space and also, to document Post-PopUp, the first programme in their newly established space.

The project was enjoyable, involving a bit of editorial design and an opportunity to get first hand experience to see through the running of More than [show] business: Post-PopUp between Post-Museum and CCA. This is a unique convergence of two different organizations working together: a research-based institution for contemporary art and an independent cultural and social enterprise for the current span of three months to collaboratively program the space.

Take aways I've had from this attachment so far, is how collaboration here is observably not limited to the two organizations but also, it extends to the negotiation with the art and civic community. PostPop-Up shuffles the professional, experimental, non-art and the amateur. This is done by the device of an open-call for shows and going by a lightly-curated and lightly-managed model of programming and showing. I remembered remarking about how exhibitions and programmes allows a shift in focus onto the subject matter or work people make, rather than on the spectacle and standing of the artist or event.

The operational currency leans towards outreach and inclusivity, playing down on stringent selection processes and distinction. This offers an effervescence of programmes that makes the institutional platform unprecedentedly accessible, experimental and tangential to more professional practices in the vicinity—something new to the otherwise commercial and frigid environment of the enclave.

The strategy seem to leverage on the white-cube as anchor to open-ended operations between the two organizations towards its use. The affiliations and followings of both, mixes crowds of different camps to the contents hosted. This framework is designed to imbue creative mixing and eventually a better understanding between the different modes.

The programming is nothing new to Post-Museum, whom by model of independence and activist sensibility, can operate as a platform for expression and civil extensions in Rowell Road and nomadically. Their efforts for the past seven years, together with some other self-run initiatives, had served as a foundational and formative role towards inculcating an ideally inclusive & diverse environment in an otherwise controlled environment. Their work can be seen as a catalyst for criticality and arguably, a more habitable civil society at large. The Centre for Contemporary Art, Singapore comes from another place in the art ecology, a young top-down investment, established by multiple governing and academic bodies in Singapore. The Centre is designed to be important in that it serves as a central programming institution and only non-commercial space of Gillman Barracks. It also is a key player in bringing in some of the biggest names in international contemporary art through exhibitions, residencies and a research centre— a facet that Singapore now adds to its infrastructure as a burgeoning regional destination for art.

The collaboration offers a meeting point for appreciation between these different communities of the local art scene that by virtue of practices, may not meet, let alone work or show together.

It is therefore really interesting for myself, when in the previous blogpost, I had problematized the institutional state-of-mind. What I have learnt from this PostPop-up was not to have a polarizing reading of independent and institutional frameworks. Independence, often discussed as an ‘alternative' or 'oppositional’ operation, can also be seen as existing outside of such singularity and measurement. In place of that, the essence of being free also allows for a multi-dimensional and inclusive reading that should focus on collaboration, that which better counters narrow and isomorphic purview to practices.

PostPop-Up ideally sets to be that layered and encompassing mode that presents itself as something more than just another event, or as the project puts, "more that (just) show business”.

This is reaffirmed from first hand experience and also from separately hearing experiences shared in the first Curatorial Roundtable. There was already talk about the subjectivities of independence in the dialogue: (1) from the point of view of an individual person, or (2) projected on an institutional level. E.g, Charles Merewether, someone who worked in large institutions internationally as creative director or curator, still considers himself as independent in the way that he has full agency to continue or leave the institution he is in, when he feels the need to.

There is still much more to do till completion and I might have a more concise point of view after. But this is what I am thinking for now.

Wednesday, 10 September 2014

journal | Pulau Gillman

by Bernice Ong 
Centre for Contemporary Art, Gillman Barracks 


Pilgrimage
       On some days, the journey to the Centre for Contemporary Art Singapore (CCA) feels a little like a pilgrimage from the far-eastern end of Singapore where I live. It is more than just a physical traversing of space. To step out of a technical role in theatre production, and into a primarily desk-bound job is a change surely. Thrown into the thick of things, as we consider and ponder the quotations from different companies bidding to be appointed our Theatrical Fields show-build contractor, it does feel pretty great to be privy to such decision-making processes. Given access to the exhibition planning process from the beginning of our internship, one of my first jobs was to draw up a timeline indicating work that was to be done by the contractors. I pondered the necessity of laying out such a clear sequence of tasks for the show-build contractor, but also quietly, really enjoyed drawing up a table and organising the necessary information. I love running about and working with my hands, but man, can I get pretty obsessive once I dive into administrative mode!

Proximity
       Interestingly, working in the Barracks does not actually accord me with more time to hang around the art galleries there in spite of my close proximity. However, the Post-PopUp program with Post-Museum (13 June - 30 October 2014) has introduced a constancy of talks at their premises, and does provide some benefit to being in the area as they are scheduled in the evenings after work hours.

Lunch
       Oh, what can I say. My favourite option is Sum Kee Food in Telok Blangah, introduced by Samantha Yap - SilverLens assistant and other curating lab extraordinaire. Otherwise, it’s a trip across Alexandra Road, through a space-age tunnel, into some office tower, before descending into a car park, which gives access to a food court full of office workers. A bit of a trek to be honest.

Space
       Unfortunately, our time at the CCA is a short-lived one. The office space of 7 Lock Road is also but a temporary one. The studio residencies are by their nature programmed in periods. And so does the name of Post-Museum’s ‘Post-PopUp’ inclusion point to its impermanence. But, being confronted by the transience of such arrangements is not all that undesirable. In my own practice as an artist, I am hugely attracted to construction sites not because I love them, but because I get really annoyed at them. Onsite research processes affords me understanding, as any prolonged discovery has got to be beneficial; I am therefore able to flip this annoyance on its head the more I engulf myself within these transitioning spaces. Changing spaces also hint at a constant renewal. In the arts, although the affordability of time offers stability with long-term benefits, I think working within limitations can also spur us on towards more creative synergy as we consciously expound on what we have.

Summary
       I have a dream of setting up an arts centre to support and connect emerging and established artists. Being at the CCA offered a good insight into the running of an organization in terms of exhibition management. Each one of us in our group had been assigned to a specific area to immerse ourselves in, and although I would have loved to have jumped more into research, it was equally wonderful to have been able to assist and observe the process of planning for Theatrical Fields’ exhibition space.

Theatrical Fields is on from 23 August - 31 October 2014
Exhibition Centre: 34 Malan Road, Singapore 109443
Opening Hours: Tue to Sun 12-7pm, Fri 12-9pm

Friday, 5 September 2014

journal | I'll be your mirror

by Samantha Yap
Centre for Contemporary Art, Gillman Barracks
 
~

Having worked in Gillman Barracks for close to seven months, at both CCA and Silverlens, it has become the landscape of my quotidian traffic. The silence of a bustling arts enclave, the people who inhabit this microcosm and the many women who actively try to make this place work – these are all part of my collective understanding and definition of the enclave.

One prominent characteristic across the complex is its decidedly strong female presence, an observation further reinforced through my internship at CCA. It led to my eventual rumination over the topic of female representation in the art world and more specifically, within Gillman Barracks itself.

Looking at representation in Gillman Barracks through a gendered perspective was something prompted by my one-month immersion with CCA. As an integral part of Gillman Barracks, it is interesting to note that CCA’s team possesses a very strong female representation. Curiously, this representation also extends (be it consciously or subconsciously) itself to exhibitions like Theatrical Fields and Paradise Lost.

Paradise Lost, which dwelled on themes of displacement, travel and personal narratives and histories, featured three female artists – Trinh T. Minh-ha, Fiona Tan and Zarina Bhimji.  The curatorial approach made no pointed emphasis towards the fact that the artists were all female. Neither were there attempts to pursue feminist tangents. Both of which are not usually common with group shows featuring female artists. Personally, I saw Paradise Lost as a beautiful subversion of androcentric approaches to culture and history.

It makes for interesting case study material, particularly in the reading and consideration of curatorial processes and exhibition-making through a gendered lens. Echoing the sentiments of “by women for women”, I wonder, does the gender of the curator and/or director have any effect in the representation of female artists in their exhibitions or artist rosters? Such a parallel may seem arbitrarily made and lacking in cogent arguments, but I want to consider it, even just for a little while. If the answer is yes, then is it sympathy? Or is it visibility? We choose who we want to see, and as females, we readily see other females too.

The fact that there are more females than males here in Gillman Barracks is not difficult to see. It could even appear as though female representation in the microcosm of Gillman Barracks is not something to worry about, far from being in dire straits. But, I would like to also cogitate on representation in an expanded sense, as something dynamic that stretches beyond mere presence.

When I speak of representation, I am thinking of presence and action, I am thinking, is our art world diverse and inclusive enough? Is it amplifying voices and strengthening the presence of those who have already been consistently in the fore? I realize I am trying (or aspiring) to deconstruct a paradigm in order to see what are the walls of barrier and powers at play. Perhaps, very simply, what I am doing is to understand what it means to be a woman (working with)in Gillman Barracks. And as a woman in Gillman Barracks, you are likely a gallery assistant or manager.

There is some talk about representation in the art world and its imbalances and inequity. The Gallery Tally, a project by Mico Hibron that looks at female representation in artist rosters, is one great precedent. The results are disappointing, the excuses even more so. The discourse about (under)representation on the Internet have mostly originated from the perspective of artists. But we should also consider gender representation amongst gallerists, gallery managers and curators, all of whom also hold an inevitable stake in the art world and the career of artists. How is the gender representation there reflective of the art world and how does it bleed into the prospects and careers of artists?

Even if the galleries within Gillman Barracks seem to balance themselves quite nicely on the scales of gender representation, there is still much more that can be read into and considered. There are still many more insidious factors at play. For instance, a certain pattern that pops up quite frequently – the dichotomy and/or relationship between male directors and gallerists and female gallery managers and assistants.  A dichotomy that reinstates the hierarchal structure of galleries, where decision making is its strongest and most absolute at the top of the pyramid.

There is female representation. There is presence, but how much does presence mean? There are not much resources that I could reference apart than the raw unattested data that lies before me.

The editors of London Review of Books declare, “Counting is a feminist weapon.

I look at the Guerrilla Girls and The Gallery Tally and I think, I have been counting for years. Furiously tabulating. It is an instinct I have developed to counter blindness. I will always choose to see. The furious counting is my furious looking, it is me realizing and remembering those who have been conveniently forgotten and conveniently overlooked. 

What is the point of this reflection? I bared no results, no percentages, just a thought piece. I ranted, rambled. Maybe, the point is to point. To make you see. Look to the direction of what has been easily obfuscated.

Talking about this little project of mine with people has so far been both aggravating and rewarding. I will embark on this (eventually). And I will keep counting.  

Any souls angry and concerned enough to go down the deep gendered end with me?

~

References

Women and book reviews / Viv Groskop. (n.d.). Retrieved September 1, 2014, from http://vivgroskop.com/women-and-book-reviews/

Wednesday, 16 July 2014

IN PROGRESS | phase 2. Internship

Two weeks ago, the second phase of the programme began as Curating Lab participants began month-long industry immersions at one of three participating institutions. Apart from gaining an overview of the activities and practice of an contemporary art institution, participants have also been involved heavily in upcoming institutional projects as well as working on their own final exhibition projects under the guidance of institutional mentors.

At NUS Museum, Luca Lum, Chua Ying Qing and Raksha Mahtani have been working on forthcoming exhibitions in 2015 including the conception of publications and public programmes. In particular, they have undertaken research into possible 'passwords' that would guide as well as gather the year's exhibitions through more collective frames.

The National Arts Council team of Selene Yap, Euginia Tan, Cheng Jia Yun and Wong Yeang Cherng divide their time between interning with the Venice Biennale Secretariat and intense research for SEABOOK that sees them working closely with artist Charles Lim, curator Shabbir Hussain Mustafa and librarian Janice Loo.

Over at the Centre for Contemporary Art, Singapore, interns Kenneth Loe, Melvin Tan, Bernice Ong and Samantha Yap have been intensively involved in Theatrical Fields, an exhibition opening August 22, More than [show] business, the collaboration between CCA and Post-Museum, as well as the institution's new artist residency programme. Their responsibilities range from exhibition design and installation, to public programming and publications, to research as well as day-to-day operations.

With another two weeks to go, track these projects and the interns' progress via Storify: