CLICK TO ACCESS EFLYER
Date: 4 September 2014, Thursday
Time: 6.30 - 9.00pm
Venue: Imagination Room, Level 5, National Library Building
Free admission with registration.
To
register, please email museum@nus.edu.sg or call 6516 8817.
Moderator:
Anca Rujoiu (Centre for Contemporary Art, Singapore)
Speakers:
Michael Lee
Florin Tudor
While the
debate on the intersections between the artist and the curator continues, much
of such discussions and theorisations continue to move at the expense of
discerning the local contexts within which they are articulated. This session
is an attempt to add to this ongoing debate concerning artistic practice and
curatorial practice; but at the same time it insists also on a plurality within
this discussion by examining the different contexts where artistic practice and
curatorial practice may meet.
About the Curatorial Roundtable Series
Presented
in conjunction with Curating Lab 2014, the Curatorial Roundtable public
talk series gathers together curators and artists working across
different fields of research and engagement, to discuss the boundaries
of curatorial practice. Amidst the increasing attention paid to the role
of the curator, this series aims to probe further into the limits of
curatorial practice. Although presented primarily for the participants
of Curating Lab 2014, the Curatorial Roundtable is an opportunity to
bridge the gap between the curator and the audience, providing
opportunities for interaction and stimulating discussions on curatorial
practices and processes.
Thursday, 28 August 2014
Wednesday, 20 August 2014
journal | ISLE2ISLE / A TALE OF TWO CITIES
by Luca Lum
I’ve travelled to New Zealand a total of nine times since I
was three years old; time is slow there, its land is vast and flat and its horizons infinite, bereft of obvious marks of civilisation.Coming
from the world I was accustomed to (sky crowded in by a dense halo of concrete
fortresses) it always seemed like a kind of terra nullius or arcadia, some
post-human earth.
Now all my travels to other places are always haunted by the spinning disorientation of spatial difference set in motion by my early visits to New Zealand. New Zealand was Other; I was Other. No matter how many times I visited, whenever I arrived I was always estranged.
Travel to all places me is precisely that feeling of estrangement, of being shorn apart and set adrift of being somewhere and at the same time nowhere, as though my feet can’t quite find a firm hold, my vision disoriented by an elusive horizon.
Now all my travels to other places are always haunted by the spinning disorientation of spatial difference set in motion by my early visits to New Zealand. New Zealand was Other; I was Other. No matter how many times I visited, whenever I arrived I was always estranged.
Travel to all places me is precisely that feeling of estrangement, of being shorn apart and set adrift of being somewhere and at the same time nowhere, as though my feet can’t quite find a firm hold, my vision disoriented by an elusive horizon.
*
In Hong Kong I am greeted by a ghost -- a black dog of cement,
heat, and noise. A spectre of the metropolis: home. The horizon is rimmed with
rooftops and my steps find their footing. Gravity challenges the evidence of
movement: the passport stamps, the tired eyes. I stare at the concrete and feel
humidity cocooning my skin and I feel not quite elsewhere, not quite nowhere.
It feels as though I’ve stepped out my front door to another street in the same
old world.
*
I find small differences that pool into larger ones. I catch
them like the drips from air-conditioning that fall into my eyes: the chatter
of Cantonese; the labyrinthine fretwork of streets that curve and weave in and
out of each other; the city’s patch-work of the old and new; the vibe of the
place, a kind of restlessness — a buzz, a trajectory, a momentum.
“How’s HK?” a friend asks on Facebook Messenger, “I remember
I didn't really like it because it was so noisy and cramped. Like Singapore,
but worse.”
It’s the second day and already it seems as though I have
seen so much, as though I have been here for years. Hong Kong shakes you awake
with its surprising turns and its unceasing rhythms. Every sense in my mind and
body is like a hypersensitive needle on a scale, tremblingly registering each
new stimuli. Moments are full-bodied, deep and vivid. I absorb everything.
We were at Spring Workshop the day before, an independent
art space known for its artist residences. I’d never seen a space for artist
residencies, and for some reason I’d anticipated cramped rooms with poor
ventilation and demanding government overseers. Spring Workshop looks like the
HK equivalent of a New York loft. Located in an old industrial site, its
grubby, garage-like exteriors give way to slick, pristine interiors — a long,
open-concept space with moving partitions that render the site malleable. It’s
relaxed, independent, fluid — a form that mirrors its function — to provide a
space outside of the main bustle of Hong Kong to develop one’s praxis. Away from the hum and distractions and beat of the main city
the mind is flushed clean and its contents can be examined and sieved like
panned gold. It’s less a return to Romantic purity than the feeling of needing
to be ensconced Elsewhere in order to work — to be at a distance from noise —
things, phenomena, people — in order to think clearly, to inhabit the mind more
fully.
“I love it here”, I message back. I tell them Singapore
feels sluggish by comparison, dogged by a certain lassitude, a complacency. A
friend from California once remarked while we were queueing for the shuttle bus
at Marina Bay Sands, Sentosa, that he found Singaporeans really trusting and
kind of naive. I was startled for a moment, but then I took a close look at the
people around us: they stood slouched, eyes glued to their phone screens,
vacantly staring into space with vaguely lobotomised expressions. They trusted
their environment. It was not going turn against them — no gum, no guns in this
sin city without the sin, a dream pristine brought to you by an urban
anaesthetic.
*
I trawl the streets of Hong Kong on our day off. On Google Maps on my phone the streets seem precise and logical — but I’m
lost once I steer my eyes to the pavement and the sky. The edges of buildings
are variegated and lines do not align to the lines on my map. I enjoy getting
lost. My limbs are tired but enlivened.
I walk with my back erect.
That night I go to a rooftop bar in Central HK with two
friends, J & V. J had studied Literature and Art History, while V studied
business. We’re outliers at the bar, kids in comparison to the well-heeled,
cosmopolitan financier types swirling liquor over low tables.
I’d met one of my friends in Singapore about a month prior.
I’d taken her around the “Unearthed” exhibition at the Singapore Art Museum
because she wanted me to show her the local arts scene. She told me she was happily
surprised that Singapore seemed so vibrant in that regard — according to her,
Hong Kong was dead by comparison.
“Our institutions are not good,” she said. “Our art museums
are terrible.”
I was surprised. I fill her in on the places we’d visited
and the people we’d talked to — the Asia Art Archive, Claire Hsu, Chantal Wong;
Para Site, Cosmin Costinas. “Hong Kong seems a lot more interesting to me.
There is something about the city’s chaos that seems to afford greater latitude
for creative work,” I tell her, “It’s less centrally regulated.”
Space is a significant factor here — like Singapore, Hong
Kong also faces incredible land-shortage, but my sense is that its approach to
urban planning is different. I see it in the patchwork character of the city. I
wonder about Hong Kong’s land-use policies and to what extent they were
centrally controlled and to what extent market-driven, and how that influences
its art ecology. I ask my friends, but they’re not certain.
*
On our way to Kowloon to obligate my desire to visit
Chungking Mansions, my friends and I pass a booth raising funds for “Occupy
Central with Love and Peace (OCLP)”, a proposed nonviolent occupation protest
for universal suffrage set to take place in Hong Kong’s Central Business
District in July, just outside one of the MTR stations. “You should go,” V
says, “This is another part you have to see. People from Hong Kong love to
protest.” I tell her sure, I’d love to, but by then I’d have flown home.
*
Chungking Mansions is gaudy and bright. The main shopping
area is lit to a full glare under florescent lights and is relatively organised
and clean. It’s filled with mostly South Asian and African migrants. A dense
node of migrant activity and littered with stores selling knock-off Casio
watches and cheap electronics, it's a colony, an ant’s hive of transplants in
the larger hive of Hong Kong, and reminds me of Lucky Plaza. The biggest difference
is that its occupants are mostly male.
“I don’t know why you want to come here.” V says, “There is
nothing special about this place. A lot of tourists come here now.” I spy
American tourists marked out by the authoritative way they take up space and
their fanny packs and big cameras slung around their necks. The dark,
labyrinthine vision presented by the vision of Wong Kar Wai in Chungking
Express is probably elsewhere in the building, in the dense tunnels above the
white glare. As though the otherness we seek is kept inside the deepest reaches
of the hive, not allowed to spill out onto the streets. The furthest we get to
piercing its interior is taking the elevator (cramped, and monitored by CCTV)
to the “The Delhi Club” and peek in through the slip of glass at the door.
*
On our last day we head to Asia Society to catch Xu Bing’s
exhibition, It Begins with Metamorphosis. It’s situated next to the British
Embassy in a quiet, affluent-looking neighbourhood dotted with posh hotels. We
cross a large rooftop space used as a garden. There were mostly student
visitors at the exhibit, gaggles of children from the French or British school.
The space has high ceilings, and looks like a tomb. A central axis runs through the gallery, and from the start of the exhibition you can see the artwork right at the end, beckoning with its aura. Except for the noisy children — who don’t know any rules and who probably wouldn’t care to obey them even if they did — the space is filled with a religious quiet. It’s hallowed ground. It’s another kind of otherness, the otherness of world sealed up around itself.
The space has high ceilings, and looks like a tomb. A central axis runs through the gallery, and from the start of the exhibition you can see the artwork right at the end, beckoning with its aura. Except for the noisy children — who don’t know any rules and who probably wouldn’t care to obey them even if they did — the space is filled with a religious quiet. It’s hallowed ground. It’s another kind of otherness, the otherness of world sealed up around itself.
Monday, 18 August 2014
journal | Honestly Speaking: Controlling Art’s Enigma
by Wong Yeang Cherng
A few weeks ago, I attended a curators’ discussion at the CCA with June Yap,
curator of No Country and Zoe Butt,
the curator of San Art. The discussion about the craft of curating was engaging,
informative and very illuminating. June went in-depth to discuss her
championship of a curatorial strategy that encourages exhibitions to pose
narratives but at the same time refrain from curtailing other forms of interpretations.
Yet, from all that was said that night, the only sentence I remembered verbatim
was June’s deceivingly perfunctory comment, “You don’t see it there but it is,” — it being the context and meaning (or narrative)
of the art piece. But, how can I know it
without being able to see it?
Art,
especially contemporary art, by its very nature can be abstract. And at most
times, it is too abstract for a self-certified art goon like me. I am certain I
suffer from one of those symptoms outlined in Shubigi Rao’s prognosis of the deranging
effects of art on the brain in her lecture-performance Visual Snow. Each time I view a show at the art museum, I leave feeling
confused. To be fair, I do take a while to give myself a chance to converse
with the artwork, to try and put its presence into perspective. But more often
than not, I tune out, often too quickly (the same way I would when someone
starts nagging). Yet, I see other visitors deep in discussion, pointing this
way and that way, gesturing at the little details and flailing their arms to
make a statement about what they saw. And all I could think of is what I should
eat for lunch.
As
someone who has never engaged with art at a level that would help make the
vicissitudes and uncertainties of art works understandable, I sincerely feel
for those who are intimidated by art and who choose to leave the museum minutes
after entry because they simply catch no
ball*. As a student of history, I am comfortable handling crumbling pages,
yellowed documents and never-ending stacks of academic books dog-eared by years
of incessant flip-throughs, but certainly not art. Yet, as part of Curating
Lab, I have to not only handle art but but curate my first art exhibition early
next year. It’s exciting but also, quite unsettling.
So
I guess the trip to the Asia Art Archive (AAA) couldn’t have come at a better
time. About a week and a half into the programme, we visited the rather
nondescript, cosy, two-storey research facility nestled in Hollywood Centre. I
truly appreciated the visit. AAA made everything about art curating make sense
to me.
Maybe
it was the Mapping Asia exhibition,
or that I was greeted with the familiar claustrophobic atmosphere of a library,
but it was at AAA that I began to feel comfortable with art. All the while, art
befuddled me because I know nothing
about what I see. Or worse, I know nought about what I ought to see. And it was
at AAA that I began to know what I want to see in art and art exhibitions —
context. Since that visit, art curating appears more grounded in information
and that made all the sense to me. Art became
as much an expression of research as it is creativity and inspiration.
I
like shows to tell me what I need to know
about the art. Of course, we can all agree to disagree. Some people would
rather look at art in itself, without insisting on knowing the context before
assessing the art work. I wouldn’t but that’s just my preference. And I
realised how important this is. One needs to remind oneself that beyond curating
for the audience, the artist or the institution, one also needs to curate for himself
or herself. One also needs to know (or rather admit) what he or she doesn’t
know and wants to know from an exhibition. In time to come, I am more certain
that the end product will end up being true to the curator’s ambitions.
Sure,
even after the fieldtrip, I am still cautious about art curating. After all, I
am still a greenhorn. I still spend most of my time in the museum staring at
art pieces without anything substantial forming in my mind. I still don’t get
it and I still wonder if my mental faculties are failing me. So I don’t mince
my words when I say, “I felt dumb.” But I’m guessing that’s the reason I’m here
— to be dumb, because it is only through ignorance that I figured out what I
want and need to know. I guess then it’s really not so bad to take step back
and honestly realise and embrace your stupidity because the only way forward is
to get smarter isn’t it?
Yc
out.
Friday, 15 August 2014
RECAP: Curatorial Roundtable 01 | Lines of Control: Curatorial Con-texts
The
first session of the Curatorial Roundtable talk series was held at the
Visitors’ Briefing Room in the National Library Building on 7 August
(Thursday), from 6.30pm to 9pm. Moderated
by Kenneth Tay, assistant curator at
the NUS Museum, Dr
Charles Merewether (NTU School of Art, Design and Media), Charmaine Toh (National Gallery
Singapore, Jennifer Teo and Woon Tien Wei (Post-Museum) came together to explore
the topic of ‘Lines of Control: Curatorial Con-texts’.
Speakers
Jennifer Teo and Woon Tien Wei have worked together for more than 10 years, in The Artists Village, p-10 and Post-Museum, an independent cultural and social space which they set up in 2007.
Curatorial Roundtable 01 | in photos
Curatorial Roundtable 01 | video
Wednesday, 13 August 2014
journal | Reflections: Curating Lab 2014
by Cheng Jia Yun
Click to see larger image. |
The map was my first attempt at summarising the first two
and a half weeks of Curating Lab. While somewhat constrained by the breadth of
two envelopes, the map format accurately reflects my sense of having been part
of a Dérive, or what one might call a 'purposeful wandering', that had been in
my opinion, masterfully designed for us eleven strangers to make our way
through the landscape of contemporary curating.
Contrary to Guy Debord's notion of psychogeography that
takes place within the city of Paris, the first day of the Curatorial Intensive
was a global tour led by Latitudes from the comfort of the National Library.
From Amsterdam to Spain to London, and then the Interweb, the comforting, if
rather dog-eared definition of a curatorial space as a solely physical one was
elegantly rubbed off our maps.
Curating Lab senpai Kenneth Tay's curator's
tour of 'When you get closer to the heart, you may find cracks' made the
exhibition pop, rendering a trajectory that successfully negotiated practical
constraints visible to us, the seemingly effortless dérive within the
exhibition space revealed as a product of carefully weighted decisions.
Wonderwoman Michelle's thorough introduction to the NUS
Museum and our Public Symposium (complete with packed hall) were rife with
questions and new methodologies, rumblings of our fertile home ground, potent
reminders to go design our own 'deh lee vehs' and generate our own start and
finish lines.
Whilst getting acquainted with the breadth and depth of
Heman's expansive Moderations project, which straddled Spring Workshop in Hong
Kong and Witte de With in Rotterdam, collaboration was foregrounded as
a fundamental premise of production. It is only natural then, that the derivé
(Hong Kong edition) was generously buoyed by Heman's chronic and infectious
fondness for having people do things together.
I leave you to trace or re-trace the paths that were taken
on the Overseas Field Trip in my chicken scrawl of a map, pulsed along as we
were from node to node, each one offering impeccably sophisticated modes of
producing knowledge such that the reverie still holds sway over me.
I'm happy to report in the meantime however, that the eleven
strangers have gotten even stranger over these first two phases, but I'm of the
mind that this bodes well for our 'deh lee vehs' of the future.
Monday, 11 August 2014
journal | Thoughts around the institutional prerogative: Part 1
by Melvin Tan
I concluded that what hit me the hardest since finally graduating from the system and joining Curating Lab + working in a small production studio, is coming to terms with how disparate the institutional/corporate mould is to the way small enterprises/collectives run.
A lot of examples of exhibitions discussed and visited during the Curatorial Intensive were set within the authority and dispensation of a government-led organization. It got me wondering about local examples that embody other curatorial modes in exhibitions/programmes/publications. Some examples were put to us to consider and yet, I still struggle to break out of the institutional state-of-mind.
By context of being ‘community-led’, ‘civil’ or ‘semi-professional’ and ‘independent’ in Singapore, I find that —in all its administration and strategy— the curatorial within such programmes are often not a specific or distinguishable praxis in its production cycle.
My new experiences in an art collective allowed me to learn the different characteristics and processes that art operates outside of the known institutional system. I saw through how a different currency to art-making imbues very different art (presenting art that institutions can’t/wouldn’t carry), the discourse and criticality is different (with/without bureaucracy, KPIs and OB markers) and the atmosphere & spectatorship is different (with/without the aggregation of market/HNIs and stakeholders of statuary boards or state-funded agencies).
The effect of not distinguishing such properties, makes the purpose of the
production and its art not clearly identifiable to the producers and
audiences. On the lived experience, operations and criticisms blur the lines
between the top-down and bottom-up modes and reflexivity is at stake as we
follow isomorphic values and parochial views to spectate/create. So I found
myself wondering about activism and liabilities of the curatorial particularly
the local context. Within the sovereignty of practice, are curators sitting in
a pivotal position to resolve such issues?
Field trip to No Country: Contemporary Art for South and Southeast Asia at CCA |
I concluded that what hit me the hardest since finally graduating from the system and joining Curating Lab + working in a small production studio, is coming to terms with how disparate the institutional/corporate mould is to the way small enterprises/collectives run.
A lot of examples of exhibitions discussed and visited during the Curatorial Intensive were set within the authority and dispensation of a government-led organization. It got me wondering about local examples that embody other curatorial modes in exhibitions/programmes/publications. Some examples were put to us to consider and yet, I still struggle to break out of the institutional state-of-mind.
So you can only imagine how much HK was an eye opener for me. Spring Workshop |
By context of being ‘community-led’, ‘civil’ or ‘semi-professional’ and ‘independent’ in Singapore, I find that —in all its administration and strategy— the curatorial within such programmes are often not a specific or distinguishable praxis in its production cycle.
My new experiences in an art collective allowed me to learn the different characteristics and processes that art operates outside of the known institutional system. I saw through how a different currency to art-making imbues very different art (presenting art that institutions can’t/wouldn’t carry), the discourse and criticality is different (with/without bureaucracy, KPIs and OB markers) and the atmosphere & spectatorship is different (with/without the aggregation of market/HNIs and stakeholders of statuary boards or state-funded agencies).
2013, opening of Closure in a Teban Gardens En-Bloc Unit |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)